Re: Dynamic loading progress

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:06:35 -0400 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote: 

>> Perhaps we should move on with "pure data" modules and implement "buffer
>> interaction" modules later?

SM> It's definitely not a requirement before it can be installed into
SM> master.  My criterion for installation into master is basically that the
SM> probability we'll soon reimplement it differently is sufficiently low
SM> (and for the code to be clean enough).

Thanks. I'll concentrate on testing the simple "pure data" cases and see
if a usable general data access model can emerge from that. If not,
we'll figure out what works...

Ted