[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD? |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:34:50 +0300 |
> From: Nicolas Richard <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:50:02 +0200
>
> Oleh Krehel <address@hidden> writes:
> > It's not obvious how simple or intricate INTERNAL_FIELD is or what it
> > does. At the first glance, looks like C++ member function call.
>
> >From the perspective of someone who never touches C source, I think
> INTERNAL_FIELD spelled out is more clear on the intent than an
> underscore.
I agree. But if this underscore always hides inside the likes of BVAR
and KVAR, and is never explicitly seen anywhere else, then we don't
really need INTERNAL_FIELD, do we?
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/23
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Oleh Krehel, 2015/04/23
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Oleh Krehel, 2015/04/23
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/23
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/04/23
Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/23