Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD?

[Stefan Monnier]

> I'd like to know as well.  So far no one objected to leaving the
> trailing underscores for the sake of the concurrency branch.  So
> unless someone does come up with objections soon, I'd interpret that
> as meaning that BVAR and KVAR should still append the underscore, and
> the fields marked INTERNAL till today should have that underscore.

I'm not opposed to removing INTERNAL_FIELD and wouldn't oppose removing
the underscore either.  But if Eli wants to keep either of them that's
fine by me as well.
The only problem I have with this is the fact that we're just going
back&forth on this.


        Stefan