Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 255a011: Add `save-mark-and-excursion', which has the old `save-excursion' behavior

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> +      (setf nmark (marker-position saved-mark))
>> ^^^^
>> Old habits die hard.
> Should `setf' be avoided?  Is it only when `setq' would do instead?

Sorry, I guess `setf' work as well, here.  I've just been bitten by
bootstrapping problems too many times, but simple.el should be late
enough that it can't be a problem.


        Stefan