[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥
|
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥ |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 May 2015 17:24:27 +0200 |
On 2015-05-11, at 16:57, Kaushal <address@hidden> wrote:
> Thanks. I personally never needed to use ». But for someone already using
> that, the ">>" binding is pretty intuitive (and same applies to "<<").
>
> I'd vote for that change to happen so that we can have ">=" and "<="
> bindings, and others beginning with "<" and ">" in future.
Me too, even though I do use C-x 8 < and C-x 8 > from time to time (as
nested quotation marks in texts).
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
- C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Stefan Monnier, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Artur Malabarba, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Yuri Khan, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Artur Malabarba, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Rasmus, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Stefan Monnier, 2015/05/11
- RE: C-x 8 shorthands for = and =, Drew Adams, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/12
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/12