[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package initialization
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: Package initialization |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jul 2015 20:09:09 +0100 |
> I also don't understand why phrases like "probably ok" are useful in
> this context. To me that sounds like: "it's ok for amateurs, who have
> little knowledge about Emacs conventions, to do it, because the harm
> will be quite limited, but real pros wouldn't do it because they are
> aware of some obscure problem that might arise even if only with low
> probability."
There are no obscure problems.
In this context, it means that probably nobody will be bothered by it. But you never know. There may be some user out there who gets enraged at the fact that they now have to add one line of code to their init file to prevent a package they explicitly installed from adding an entry to auto-mode-alist.
- Re: Package initialization, (continued)
- Re: Package initialization, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/20
- Re: Package initialization, Chad Brown, 2015/07/20
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/20
- Re: Package initialization,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: Package initialization, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/20
- Re: Package initialization, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/07/21
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/21
- Re: Package initialization, Alexis, 2015/07/25
- Re: Package initialization, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, Stefan Monnier, 2015/07/19
- Re: Package initialization, Helmut Eller, 2015/07/20
- Re: Package initialization, Stefan Monnier, 2015/07/20
- Re: Package initialization, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/07/21
- Re: Package initialization, David Kastrup, 2015/07/21