[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:31:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> And if a project implementation has to provide its own implementation,
>> it's much cleaner, I think, if it only has to deal with
>> project-search-path-function, instead of being forced to
>> cl-call-next-method.
> Well, that's my question. I don't see that as "cleaner"; I much prefer
> object dispatching to random funcalls.
Currently, project-search-path-function takes no argument, so there's
not much on which to dispatch.
Stefan
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, (continued)
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/30
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Stephen Leake, 2015/07/31
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/31
- Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el,
Stefan Monnier <=