[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ChangeLog entries
From: |
Phillip Lord |
Subject: |
Re: ChangeLog entries |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:16:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: address@hidden (Phillip Lord)
>> Cc: <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 16:46:20 +0100
>>
>> They are both changes to trunk. feadec was a change *originally* made on
>> a branch, 45987 is a merge commit pulling feadec onto trunk also. I
>> wanted Nicolas to okay by change given that it was his code.
>
> Then please in the future use the format we follow, which is identical
> to ChangeLog entries: a function name in parentheses followed by the
> description of what changes were made in that function.
Ah, okay, will do that in future.
>
>> I'd rather feadec wasn't deleted. It's my first ChangeLog entry and I'm
>> really rather proud of it, pathetic as that might sound.
>
> I'm only talking about the form, not about the contents. I suggest to
> edit ChangeLog.2 to make this entry into its correct form, and commit
> the change.
Is the ChangeLog not autogenerated from the commit message? This is what
I had assumed. I can change the ChangeLog.2 without changing the commit
message?
Phil
Re: ChangeLog entries, Paul Eggert, 2015/08/09