Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:10:12 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> > From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> > Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 12:27:46 -0400
> > 
> > > But why does it have to be a separate command?  Can't "C-u C-x v v",
> > > when it calls vc-checkin, present that header in the vc-log buffer, so
> > > that muscle memory doesn't have to change?
> > 
> > Actually, removing this use of C-u is one of the main benefits, in my mind.
> 
> Probably because you have no use for the feature in the first place.

And, btw, the removal of the capability to specify a revision didn't
remove the prefix argument, it just limited its meaning to specifying
a different back-end.