Re: burden of maintainance

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, Andreas Röhler
>  <address@hidden>, Emacs-devel <address@hidden>
> From: Przemysław Wojnowski <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 08:42:58 +0200
> 
> > "make check" is part of the GNU Coding Standards.  See:
> Maybe it should be changed to conform to the rest of the world, making
> it intuitive at the same time.
> 
> IMHO the name should reveal its intent and "check" doesn't tell what is
> it checking (maybe whether environment is ready for compilation?).
> 
> "make test" is understandable and intuitive, especially to anyone who
> has any experience building software in other environments.

If they both do the same, we have the best of all worlds, no?  So why
continue arguing?