|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Suggest: dont declare interactive-p obsolete |
Date: | Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:46:32 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 |
On 11/19/2015 03:06 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote:
Instead of using this function, it is cleaner and more reliable to give your function an extra optional argument whose `interactive' spec specifies non-nil unconditionally (\"p\" is a good way to do this), or via \(not (or executing-kbd-macro noninteractive)).
You're just saying that neither the old, nor the new function should be used in most of the Lisp code. That may be true, but that doesn't say anything about whether the old name should be un-obsoleted.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |