Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc.

[Paul Eggert]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> it would be a maintenance burden to have to
>      analyze upon each such change whether emacs-module.c needs some
>      augmentation.

While that's true in general, I think some exceptions are OK.  E.g., it's OK if 
emacs-module.c assumes that ASIZE is a simple access function or macro that 
doesn't throw signals.  If we actually changed ASIZE to throw signals, there's a 
boatload of other code we'd need to change as well, and changing emacs-module.c 
wouldn't add much more to the maintenance burden.