Re: Lisp watchpoints

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 09:12:34 -0500
> From: Noam Postavsky <address@hidden>
> Cc: John Wiegley <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,
>       Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> 
> > Ffuncall does all necessary checks.
> 
> It would signal in case of error right? Currently the code is ignoring
> bad watcher elements (including out of range integers), but perhaps
> it's actually better to signal an error.

No, I think it would be better to report an error, and then continue,
perhaps after removing the watch.