Re: tags-loop-continue

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 01/10/2016 07:08 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> Those commands are very deficient without tags-loop-continue.  The
> idea is that you iterate through many files, doing whatever you do in
> each one of them.  If you cannot continue the loop, these commands are
> so much less convenient as to be almost useless.

Ok, I agree we should provide some access to it.

> We cannot decide that commands are unimportant just because no one
> yells the moment we make such changes.

Not the moment we made that change, nor in the months that have passed 
since.

> These are powerful commands,
> and it's quite expected that they are not used every day.  It doesn't
> mean they are not used at all, or that they can be removed or ignored.

A command that isn't used every day can afford to have a less convenient 
binding, or have its binding changed sometimes.

> Ahem... if the documentation update was done back when the code
> changes were made, we would be having this discussion in time, instead
> of doing this now.

That's beside the point.

The lack of user complaints so far is a strong data point.