Re: tags-loop-continue

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:09:23 +0300
> 
> On 01/14/2016 10:41 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Could be fine, I think.  We did change this in find-definition, so
> > maybe making a similar change in Dired is okay as well.
> 
> Nice. What do we do? Change dired-do-search to use the new UI, or add a 
> new command?

A new command, I think.  One step at a time.

> Do we call the new command simply dired-find-regexp?

It should be dired-do-SOMETHING, for consistency with others.
Otherwise, yes, something like that.

> >> What are the requirements, then?
> >
> > I don't know, to present a reasonable UI for an equivalent
> > functionality?
> 
> That just comes down to adding dired-find-regexp that uses the xref UI, 
> AFAICS. Do we also change the `A' binding in Dired? And unbind `Q'?

Or maybe have a minor variant bound to 'Q' that would also ask for a
replacement, like query-replace?