[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Next release from master
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Next release from master |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:45:45 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 |
On 01/18/2016 01:43 PM, John Wiegley wrote:
>>>>>> Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I'd be happy with switching to a less-like release scheme and
>> incrementing a single number. Do minor releases even make sense anymore?
>
> I think so. If we only increment major numbers, there is no sense of when big
> things happen, and or how much one should expect APIs to change between
> releases.
We try to keep APIs backward-compatible anyway though. In a
single-number, time-based release system, we'd just announce that we're
deprecating some API, and some time later, actually do it.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Next release from master, (continued)
- Re: Next release from master, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/18
- Re: Next release from master, John Wiegley, 2016/01/18
- Re: Next release from master, Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/18
- Re: Next release from master, John Wiegley, 2016/01/18
- Re: Next release from master,
Daniel Colascione <=
- Re: Next release from master, John Wiegley, 2016/01/18
- Re: Next release from master, Stefan Monnier, 2016/01/18
- Re: Next release from master, John Wiegley, 2016/01/18
- Re: Next release from master, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/18
Re: Next release from master, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/18
Re: Next release from master, Glenn Morris, 2016/01/21