Re: tags-loop-continue

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 22:11:41 +0300
> 
> On 01/21/2016 10:02 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Yes, I know.  But in this case a partial solution is better than no
> > solution at all, IMO.
> 
> Not sure about that: I _don't_ want to call 
> `change-next-error-last-buffer' every time, and type the buffer's name. 
> I simply won't use that.

You don't have to if you don't want to.  But someone else might.

> > We don't need to solve every corner case now.
> 
> For all we know, a proper solution won't include the kind of command 
> you're suggesting at all. I don't want to leave another historical accident.

Fine, then let's have the proper solution.  Having none in v25.1 is
not an option.