Re: Asynchronous DNS

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:

> I kinda think we've gotten as far as we're going to get in this discussion,
> and that it's time to merge.

Hi Lars,

Given that there is disagreement from a main developer on this, I ask that
your change remain in a feature branch until we've had more time to reach
consensus, and to hear from others (some of whom I've copied directly, to
better ensure they receive this).

I do appreciate the contribution, and think asynchronous DNS is a valuable
addition, but it hasn't passed the litmus test yet for merging toward the next
release. If agreement can be reached before the next freeze, that's great;
otherwise, it will have to wait until later.

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature