Re: Asynchronous DNS

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Alain Schneble <address@hidden> writes:

> I think it should be feasible, really.  The ones I had identified were
> these (oh, I think I just looked in process.c, but that should be
> sufficient, right?):
>
> `process-contact', `set-process-filter', `set-process-filter-multibyte',
> `set-process-window-size', `set-network-process-option',
> `set-process-coding-system', `process-filter-multibyte-p',
> `process-datagram-address', `set-process-datagram-address',
> `process-send-region', `process-send-string', `process-send-eof'

Yeah, that isn't a very scary-looking list of functions, so perhaps it's
doable without any regressions...

> Maybe the last three wouldn't be candidates as they throw an error even
> in the current implementation in case the process status is still
> 'connect, as you and I pointed out already in earlier notes.

Yup.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no