[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Thinking about changed buffers
From: |
Stephan Mueller |
Subject: |
RE: Thinking about changed buffers |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:33:49 +0000 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
" For this, `SPC C-x u' at point-min should be sufficient to cause
" cperl-mode (and perl-mode as well) to flush all the existing
" highlighting data.
Thanks, I'll try that. Moving to point-min and back may make
that more awkward than revert-buffer. Regardless, at the very
least, I should hide one or the other approach in a function and
bind it to a key.
Lars writes:
" Does this perhaps mean that the interactive `C-x C-s' command should
" always save the file, even if it's unchanged? We've apparently all
" taken to doing pointless modifications because we haven't found an easy
" way to make Emacs re-save the file...
I follow your logic, but I'm not sure about this simplification; I
find that I hit `C-x C-s' all the time (whenever I enter my mental
idle loop, perhaps), and am pleased that it doesn't do anything
unnecessarily on those extremely numerous occasions. Perhaps
a new, distinct command really-save-buffer, bound to C-x C-S-s ?
Or prefix save-buffer with four `C-u's (1 through 3 are already
taken)?
stephan();
Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
RE: Thinking about changed buffers, Stephan Mueller, 2016/03/28
Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2016/03/28
Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Florian Weimer, 2016/03/29
Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Phillip Lord, 2016/03/29