[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build failure for Emacs master
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Build failure for Emacs master |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:29:30 +0300 |
> From: Andy Moreton <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:30:19 +0100
>
> >> (gdb) p/x ¤t_buffer->text->beg[0]
> >> $4 = 0x65a0000
> >> (gdb) find /b9
> >> current_buffer->text->beg,current_buffer->text->beg+GPT_BYTE-1,0
> >> 0x66c36b4
> >> 1 pattern found.
> >
> > That's not the nulls you reported. What is the value of GPT_BYTE at
> > this point, and what is the value of Z_BYTE?
>
> It's not the same binary - efforts to detect what causes the corruption
> necessitate rebuilding.
You said you can reproduce this at will, so I thought doing that is
not a problem, and then the values would be the same as in this run.
Apologies if I misunderstood.
> > Sorry, I'm still confused: are the nulls coming from a previous
> > loaddefs.el, or are they coming from Emacs? If the latter, is it true
> > that to reproduce the problem, you need to start from a clean tree,
> > but use an outdated version of ldefs-boot.el?
>
> As I understand it, building from a clean tree:
> a) temacs.exe is built (a bare emacs)
> b) bootstrap-emacs.exe is built from temacs.exe, using ldefs-boot.el
The last part is only true if there's no loaddefs.el file in the
tree. See the commentary and the relevant code in loadup.el. If
loaddefs.el does exist, bootstrap-emacs build will use it.
> As one of my experiments produced a good loaddefs.el, I did this:
> - start from a completely clean emacs-25 tree
> - overwrite ldefs-boot.el with the previously built loaddefs.el
> - do a full bootstrap, which succeeded.
What are the differences between that "successful" loaddefs.el and
ldefs-boot.el which produces a corrupted loaddefs.el? The only
changes I see are in the time stamp cookies.
> I do not know if replacing ldefs-boot.el with a freshly built loaddefs.el
> fixed the problem, or simply moved the timing around enough that this
> Heisenbug no longer occurred.
Sorry, I don't understand: what timing could change as result of
modifying one of the inputs? Are you saying that the differences (in
size or content) are so significant s to affect the time to read the
file into memory?
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, (continued)
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/14
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Andy Moreton, 2016/04/14
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/14
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Andy Moreton, 2016/04/14
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/14
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Andy Moreton, 2016/04/14
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Andy Moreton, 2016/04/15
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/15
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Andy Moreton, 2016/04/15
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Angelo Graziosi, 2016/04/18
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/18
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Andy Moreton, 2016/04/18
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Angelo Graziosi, 2016/04/19
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/19
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Angelo Graziosi, 2016/04/19
- Re: Build failure for Emacs master, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/19