|Subject:||Re: M-x send-emacs-patch|
|Date:||Thu, 05 May 2016 11:39:05 +0000|
That's a neat idea.
So instead of a new send-emacs-patch function, should we simply make it an alias for report-emacs-bug.
Then we need to just add more info in report-emacs-bug docstring and reword the email body to that they would apply to bug reports, feature requests and patch submissions.
Instead of a new function, rename report-emacs-bug to non-interactive function report-emacs that accepts arguments like 'bug, 'feature or 'patch. Then based on the argument, we can have different wording in the email body, choose to dump the user's emacs state containing variables, last executed commands, etc.
Then we have wrapper interactive functions like report-emacs-bug, request-emacs-feature and send-emacs-patch that calls that same base function with different arguments.
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> wrote:
> But we are supposed to send features request via report-emacs-bug which
> is also odd.
(defalias request-emacs-feature report-emacs-bug)? :)
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|