[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook
From: |
Mark Oteiza |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Jul 2016 13:48:57 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.2+13 (488f91a85115) (2016-07-01) |
On 17/07/16 at 11:17am, Noam Postavsky wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Kaushal Modi <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I'm neither for or against this change. But if this change is done in
> > eldoc.el, then shouldn't the add-function to add-hook change be done in all
> > the major modes too? Like in elisp-mode.el, etc.
> >
>
> Ping! I just bumped into this elisp-mode.el case while playing with
> the bootstrap. Please revert this, or fix callers, thanks.
Pushed as 001d88b:
0001-Use-eldoc-documentation-functions.patch
Description: Text Data
Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/17
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/17
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Mark Oteiza, 2016/07/18
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/18
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Mark Oteiza, 2016/07/19
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/19
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, John Wiegley, 2016/07/20
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Mark Oteiza, 2016/07/20