Re: A few thoughts on seq.el

[Tino Calancha]

On Sun, 31 Jul 2016, Nicolas Petton wrote:

> However, I could introduce another function that would take a predicate,
> and `seq-position' could reuse it.  But I don't want to get rid of
> `seq-position' as it exists today, I think it's too useful.

It would be great having such new function.
I have some code which use `cl-position-if'.
With the inclusion of this new func in 'seq i could
switch easily to 'seq instead of 'cl-lib if i wish.