[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-losedows-builder
From: |
Tim Cross |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-losedows-builder |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Sep 2016 16:51:59 +1000 |
This reminds me of arguments from the 70s with the growth of feminism. At the time, there were some in the feminist movement who argued to ban the use of "man" even when the roots of the word had nothing to do with gender. It certainly didn't benefit the movement or help gain credibility - in the main it was seen as somewhat ridiculous and if anything gave ammunition to the anti-feminist movement. I fear this discussion will do the same.
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, (continued)
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Simon Friis Vindum, 2016/09/01
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Stallman, 2016/09/01
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Stallman, 2016/09/02
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/09/02
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Kaushal Modi, 2016/09/02
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Copley, 2016/09/02
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Stallman, 2016/09/03
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder,
Tim Cross <=
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Stallman, 2016/09/04
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Stallman, 2016/09/02
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Emanuel Berg, 2016/09/02
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, John Wiegley, 2016/09/01