[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Overlays as an AA-tree
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Overlays as an AA-tree |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:58:55 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:52:23 -0400
>
> > Speaking of which, is the byte position stored in a marker of any
> > significance in an overlay? Otherwise I could at least get rid of
> > those.
>
> AFAIK, the byte-position of markers is used, but the byte-position of
> overlays isn't, so you should be able to get rid of them.
Why bother? Using markers, you get the way overlays move when text is
inserted and deleted for free, and having to update the byte position
is easy if needed.
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, (continued)
Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/21
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2016/09/22
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/22
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2016/09/22
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/22
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2016/09/27
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/27