Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added

[Phillip Lord]

John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:

>>>>>> "PL" == Phillip Lord <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> Why would anyone be rebuilding core libraries? Or are you proposing this
>>> for the Emacs developers?
>
> PL> Non core developers who become core developers, bringing their packages
> PL> with them.
>
> I would like to not add any new core libraries, until the day we need to
> depend upon them from other core libraries. New development, as much as
> possible, should be directed to ELPA. The whole point of this new ELPA reorg
> is that, by making it easy to include ELPA code in the distribution, there is
> no longer any real reason to pull new code into core.  The core of what Emacs
> does changes relatively little from version to version.


Okay, we're just getting confused in terminology. Yes, I mean, people
who are current writing lisp which is not distributed with Emacs. So,
non-core developers who want to get their package into the tar ball.

Phil