[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Oct 2016 19:16:14 +0300 |
> From: address@hidden (Phillip Lord)
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 13:32:34 +0100
>
> > But I do not really understand when exactly we have to distinguish
> > between the two formats. Isn't it more like a one way extraction of
> > ELPA package into core and then the job is done and distinction doesn't
> > really matter anymore?
>
> Not if we are using package.el to make the packages available. It is
> package.el which sets the load path, loads the autoloads file, that sort
> of thing.
If it's package.el dictating this, then let's change it or extend it
to support what we need.