[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Nov 2016 08:55:23 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> It is not likely. There is statistical information that was
> cited earlier in this thread. Windows 9x and ME are now below 0.01%
> usage. How much below is hard to measure.
It seems I was mistaken in what I remembered. Maybe it was Windows XP
that was still being installed a few years ago.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, (continued)
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Elias MÃ¥rtenson, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/08
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/08
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/06
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Noam Postavsky, 2016/11/06