[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el |
|
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2017 17:56:16 +0200 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:39:12 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > How about 'with-fetched-url', then?
>
> Hm... I'm not sure it gives us more clarity. It should really be
> `with-content-fetched-from-specified-url', but that's a bit long, right?
> So I think `with-url' is fine for anybody who's working with these
> things.
Both Richard and myself came up with almost identical comments on
with-url, so I hope you will reconsider.