Re: with-url

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 22.01.2017 00:23, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> > You said "none of these should signal an error from the library" in
> > response to my enumerations of different kinds of errors: 404,
> > hostname resolution failure, connection timeout.
>
> Yes...  but you asked about how code would examine "the absence of a
> connection timeout".  I don't know what you mean.

That's exactly my point. You said that none of these should be errors, 
and then only replied how the callers will find out about the error 
status, not about the other kinds of errors.

> If there's no timeout
> (and there's no other errors), `url-errorp' says nil.

So, in the Brave New World the callers will continue to use url-errorp? 
Error handling C-style?