[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Overlays as an AA-tree
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Overlays as an AA-tree |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Feb 2017 16:22:00 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
> No problem. Simply write a NEWS entry and declare it a new feature.
That's an efficient solution, indeed.
> If I'm right, we *could* use one tree for front-advance overlays and one
> for non-front-advance ones, such that these tree won't ever become
> unordered by insertion/deletion of text.
But I don't think this one is an efficient solution. I'm not even sure
it will lead to simpler code (at least I'm pretty sure it will lead to
more code).
Stefan
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/03
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/04
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/07
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2017/02/07