[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Overlays as an AA-tree
|
From: |
Andreas Politz |
|
Subject: |
Re: Overlays as an AA-tree |
|
Date: |
Sun, 05 Feb 2017 00:10:00 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> If I'm right, we *could* use [two trees] [...]
>
> But I don't think this one is an efficient solution. I'm not even sure
> it will lead to simpler code (at least I'm pretty sure it will lead to
> more code).
Yes, I'm not in favour of it either.
-ap
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/03
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/04
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree,
Andreas Politz <=
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/07
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2017/02/07
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/07