Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch

[Stefan Monnier]

>> char foo[] = "for (x = 0; x < n; x++) /* Loop header */\n";
>> ^                                        ^

>> where the user narrows to the string, then goes to EOL and does
>> M-: (forward-comment -1)

> Even if the user narrows to the string, it's still a string.  It's not a
> comment, and can't be one.

As the user who did the above operation I beg to differ: I narrowed
specifically because I wanted to treat this as the chunk of C code
it is.

It would be arrogant for Emacs to claim it knows better than the user.


        Stefan