|
| From: | Paul Eggert |
| Subject: | Re: request to reconsider libnettle/libhogweed |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:58:57 -0800 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 |
On 03/02/2017 06:59 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
* we already link to GnuTLS, which means those C functions are available already.
If Emacs's module system were always present and worked well, this could be supported via a module that consisted entirely of glue, i.e., a module that merely exposes C functions already present in Emacs. Since the module system isn't guaranteed, though, it may be better to create new built-in Elisp functions for this, at least for now.
Is there some way that we can say "these functions are built-in now, but may be moved to a module later"? If not, perhaps there should be.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |