[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (unknown)
From: |
Mark Oteiza |
Subject: |
Re: (unknown) |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Mar 2017 15:16:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Pogonyshev <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> Have you tried to measure the impact of your patch on the actual problem?
>>> I mentioned 3%.
>>
>>That's the percentage impact on the number of lambdas. I'm curious
>>about its impact on actual problematic aspects, such as speed and code
>>size (and compilation time, I guess).
>>
>>> Yes, it is practically negligible, but this is a first small patch and
>>> I'm willing to work on improving generators further.
>>
>>Of course.
>
> Actually, forget it. It's too complicated to jump through all the hoops here.
Darn. Such improvements would be nice.
> I would just be glad if someone applied the patch from bug 26068. It's a
> fix, not an optimization, and there is example of a form, evaluation of
> which it fixes.
Applied, thanks. AFAICT it didn't break any tests and didn't exacerbate
bug#12119 which the previous code was fixing.
- [no subject], Paul Pogonyshev, 2017/03/19
- Re: (unknown),
Mark Oteiza <=