|
| From: | Philipp Stephani |
| Subject: | Re: pure-fns in byte-opt.el |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Jul 2017 17:52:50 +0000 |
> Hmm. I get the argument, but wouldn't that mean that only a tiny set of
> builtins were pure?
Indeed, according to that definition of pure, very few Elisp
functions qualify.
Which is why this is not exactly the definition used for pure-fns.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |