[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Sep 2017 11:01:51 +0300 |
> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 23:59:32 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > nglyphs is always positive, it comes from nchars of a glyph_string, or
> > similar.
> >
> > Angelo and Richard, can you please try that eassume and see if it
> > shuts up the warning?
>
> I have applied this patch:
>
> --- w32font.c~ 2017-09-07 21:49:47.000000000 +0200
> +++ w32font.c 2017-09-07 23:14:22.997647400 +0200
> @@ -544,6 +544,7 @@
> information. */
>
> /* Make array big enough to hold surrogates. */
> + eassume (0 <= nglyphs);
> wcode = alloca (nglyphs * sizeof (WORD) * 2);
> for (i = 0; i < nglyphs; i++)
> {
>
> ..and didn't find warning about w32font.c!
Thanks.
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, (continued)
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/10
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Angelo Graziosi, 2017/09/10
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/10
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Angelo Graziosi, 2017/09/10
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/10
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Angelo Graziosi, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Fabrice Popineau, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/07
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Angelo Graziosi, 2017/09/07
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build,
Eli Zaretskii <=