[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Sep 2017 21:57:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
() Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
() Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:14:32 +0000
> So I must ask you to please revert, and let's wait
> until the discussion comes to its completion.
Done; I probably should have waited a few days.
Just a thought (also applicable to YAML, etc), while waiting:
How about we use this opportunity to explore the (C language)
modules support? Parsing is in practice a bug-ridden endeavor,
so if we're going to do it in C (i.e., commit to handling all
those latent CVEs), why not prioritize isolation more highly?
Even more extremely, why not call out to an external program?
For instance, modify jq(1) to emit sexps for Emacs to ‘read’ (w/
proper exception handling). This would benefit other Lisp and
(maybe) Scheme systems as well.
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen -----------------------------------------------
(defun responsep (query)
(pcase (context query)
(`(technical ,ml) (correctp ml))
...)) 748E A0E8 1CB8 A748 9BFA
--------------------------------------- 6CE4 6703 2224 4C80 7502
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, (continued)
- Speed of Elisp (was: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance), Stefan Monnier, 2017/09/17
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Richard Stallman, 2017/09/19
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Glenn Morris, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/19