Re: `thunk-let'?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:34:32 -0500
> 
> > Hmm - Would it even be acceptable to make `lazy-let' and `lazy-let*' the
> > only names?
> 
> I think you're over-thinking it.  If I were you, I'd go with thunk-let
> which doesn't need any authorization/argument, yet works well enough.
> If/when it turns out to become wildly popular or unacceptably confusing,
> we can add an alias and/or rename it.

I agree.