[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Dec 2017 13:32:50 +0200 |
> From: Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:28:02 -0800
> Cc: emacs-devel <address@hidden>, Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
>
> > diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
> > index e4d8a20..fa6b789 100644
> > --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
> > +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
> > @@ -1924,7 +1924,8 @@ byte-compile-file
> > ;; process is trying to load target-file (eg in a
> > ;; parallel bootstrap), it does not risk getting a
> > ;; half-finished file. (Bug#4196)
> > - (tempfile (make-temp-file target-file))
> > + (tempfile
> > + (make-temp-file (file-name-nondirectory
> > target-file)))
> > (default-modes (default-file-modes))
> > (temp-modes (logand default-modes #o600))
> > (desired-modes (logand default-modes #o666))
>
> Hi Eli,
> Yes, with emacs built from latest master plus your patch, running
> automake's lisp-related tests now (with my in-preparation patch)
> succeeds. I.e., these passed:
>
> make check TESTS="$(echo t/lisp*.sh)"
Thanks, pushed to the release branch.
- Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file,
Eli Zaretskii <=