emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for a new package on ELPA: Elbank


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: Proposal for a new package on ELPA: Elbank
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:15:57 -0500

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > To me, it sounds like a 'bot' framework,

Is there a difference between a "bot framework" and something that allows
people to automate their communications with web services?

It appears to me this is a case of a general-purpose tool that can be used
for good or for bad.  Like wget.

Is this criticism more valid for Weboob than it would be for wget?

Can you offer a constructive criticism?  A way that Weboob could aid
ethical uses more and unethical uses less?

                                             which would make FSF/ELPA enablers
  > for the type anti-social web-izens

No it wouldn't.  Even supposing that your criticism were valid for
Weboob -- which has not been demonstrated -- it would not be valid for
our program, Elbank, which would use Weboob only for doing a
legitimate job.

                                       that have lead us all to suffer all forms
  > of captcha.

I see no reason to think Elbank would have that effect.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]