Re: pcase-if-let?

[Michael Heerdegen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> Oh, right we need the `let*` kind of scoping.

I call it `if-matching' for now (like in "if [given clauses are]
matching [do this else that]").

Apropos "let*": I realized it's semantically absolutely the same as
`pcase-let*' but executing an else branch when not all patterns match
(what pcase-let* silently assumes).  So I guess I should rather look how
these are implemented.


Michael.