Re: pcase-if-let?

[Michael Heerdegen]

Nathan Moreau <address@hidden> writes:

> (pcase-if
>     ((`(,q . ,r) '())
>      (`(,s . ,u) '(b c)))
>     (list q r s u 'ok)
>   'nope)
> =>  nil
>
>
> ?
> I would have expected 'nope instead.

Sure, good catch.  There's a catchall rule missing in my implementation
that evaluates the else forms when matching fails (like above).

A better implementation would probably more look like that of
`pcase-let*'.  Seems I already get something like pcase-if when I change
the pcase--dontcare rule in `pcase--let*'.


Thanks,

Michael.