[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?
From: |
George Plymale II |
Subject: |
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port? |
Date: |
Sat, 19 May 2018 12:06:22 -0400 |
> Yes, they will, but it’s still messy. You end up with menus that do
> absolutely nothing.
Oh, okay.
> I was hoping someone who knew would read this and give me a pointer in
> the right direction. If not I’ll get round to it at some point. :)
Oh, LOL, sorry.
> One thing to bear in mind is that the Mac port is a completely
> different code base than the NS port. The Mac port was originally
> written for the Carbon API, and the NS port for NeXTSTEP (now Cocoa
> and GNUstep).
>
> They do share some things (most notably macfont.m), but it’s not a
> given that something broken in one will be broken in the other, or
> that the code can be copied directly between them.
Right, I am aware of such differences. I just thought that perhaps some
of the Mac Port's code could be somehow imitated in the NS port to solve
this particular problem. But I can completely understand why that may
not be viable without changing a lot of parts in the NS port.
If it's not doable, that's fine. I'm just throwing suggestions out to
see what sticks.
- George Plymale II
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, (continued)
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/05/15
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/15
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/15
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/18
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/18
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/23
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/23
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?,
George Plymale II <=
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/21
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Van L, 2018/05/21
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/22
- Off Topic (was: Should this package be included into the NS port?), Van L, 2018/05/22
- Re: Off Topic (was: Should this package be included into the NS port?), Alan Third, 2018/05/23
- emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure (was: Off Topic), Van L, 2018/05/23
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Robert Pluim, 2018/05/24
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Van L, 2018/05/24
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Robert Pluim, 2018/05/24