Re: rx.el sexp regexp syntax

[Basil L. Contovounesios]

Robert Pluim <address@hidden> writes:

> João Távora <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Drew Adams <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Given such functions, I might use RX and the show-me-the-regexp
>>> function to create a regexp string, which I'd leave in the code,
>>> and I might use the show-me-the-RX function when I need to change
>>> such a string (or think about it).
>>
>> +1, FWIW. But are there such functions? </delurk>
>
> rx->regexp obviously exists, but Iʼm not aware of the reverse.

At first glance, lex-parse-re from lex.el seems to fill the role, though
its output might need a little tweaking to be completely rx-compatible.

-- 
Basil