[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Three cheers for Eli!

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Three cheers for Eli!
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2018 17:58:05 +0300

> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2018 22:32:54 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>   > > The term "inclusive development projects" might fit your concept.
>   > > Or "community-contribution software projects".
>   > >
>   > ​Neither suggestion rolls off my tongue.  How about "community-based"?
> That term has various possible interpretations, and some of them do
> not fit GNU Emacs.  People might take it to imply a project that is
> independent and run by whoever participates.  That is not how a GNU
> package works.

Maybe I'm missing something: is there a problem to say "free software
and open-source projects"?  There's no doubt open-source projects do
exist, it's just that GNU projects are not among them.  But if someone
wants to name them all collectively, where's the problem in that?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]