Re: pcase: Semantics of atom QPATS

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 09:32:10 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > > Ok.  Is this patch ok for emacs-26?
> >
> > Changes in documentation and comments are always okay there, but I'm
> > uneasy with changes that modify behavior.  Why is it important to
> > support non-integer numbers in Emacs 26.2?
> 
> It's not important, no I thought it would be harmless, but master is ok
> for me.

Then let's do this on master, please.

> > > -   ((or (stringp qpat) (integerp qpat) (symbolp qpat)) `',qpat)
> > > +   ((or (stringp qpat) (numberp qpat) (symbolp qpat)) `',qpat)
> >
> > Any reasons to use numberp and not number-or-marker-p?
> 
> Is it likely that someone constructs a pcase pattern with a literal
> marker in it?

I have no idea.