[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Jul 2018 07:27:37 -0700 (PDT) |
> I've noticed usage of "the cursor" and "point" throughout manuals and
> doc-strings. In what context is one preferred over the other?
Point is the buffer position of the cursor (aka text cursor).
In the Emacs manual (`C-h r'), `i point' and `i cursor'
both take you to node `Point', which explains this.
- "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation, Siraphob (Ben) Phipathananunth, 2018/07/03
- RE: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2018/07/03
- Re: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation, John Yates, 2018/07/03
- Re: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation, Richard Stallman, 2018/07/03
- Re: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation, John Yates, 2018/07/04
- Re: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/04
- RE: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation, Drew Adams, 2018/07/04
- Re: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation, Richard Stallman, 2018/07/04
- Re: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation, John ff, 2018/07/04
Re: "Point" vs. "cursor" in documentation, Siraphob (Ben) Phipathananunth, 2018/07/03