[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bignum branch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: bignum branch |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2018 14:32:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> That's what I'd expect as well, and so I don't think --with-wide-int
> will die too quickly.
Not in the near future, no. For that reason I just said "eventually".
> I personally need to use buffers larger than
> 0.5GB all the time on my daytime job.
Is that on 32bit systems (i.e. using wide-int)?
Do these rarely exceed the 2GB limit?
By "use" I assume you mean also "edit", right?
Stefan
- Re: bignum branch, (continued)
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/13
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/13
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/14
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/14
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/07/15
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/15
- Re: bignum branch, Stefan Monnier, 2018/07/16
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/16
- Re: bignum branch, Stefan Monnier, 2018/07/16
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/16
- Re: bignum branch,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/16
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/07/16
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/16
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/21
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/07/22
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/22
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/15
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/15
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/15
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/16